The Air Jordan 11 "Concord (2018)" marks the return of one of the most celebrated sneakers of all time. The famous black and white Jordan 11 worn by Michael Jordan in 1995 and 1996 needs no introduction, but this latest edition does feature some details not seen on previous “Concord” retro releases. The remastered construction features a higher cut to the black patent leather mudguard, as well as “45” — the uniform number Jordan initially wore when he returned from his first retirement in 1995 — replacing the traditional “23” on the heels. This 2018 release honors the first pairs of the “Concord” AJ11 that Jordan debuted in the 1995 NBA Playoffs with the “45” branding. The Air Jordan 11 “Concord” officially released on December 8 and is no doubt one of the year’s biggest sneaker releases.

Air Jordan 3 White Cement Size 11 Retro "Concord "

Reviewer Ruby G

I love these shoes. They fit great and they look good too. I have a narrow foot, so I can't tell you if they are tight. I have never put a pair of shoes and thought they were too narrow. I will probally buy another pair of a different color.

Reviewer Carmel Finley

they are a bit on the narrow side. I ordered a half size up knowing this...and that helps. My foot is about a D/E width. Any wider of a foot than that and you will be unhappy.

Reviewer andyc

The shoes are really nice, the only bad thing (that’s why just 4 stars) is that it said “leather” and that’s why I bought them but are fabric. They are nice but will get dirty quickly, I was looking for leather shoes and not just leather shoelaces

Reviewer trevstonlongworth

I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.

I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.

I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.

Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.

Reviewer Kurt Frey

These are the best sneakers I have ever purchased. Well worth the price. The support is perfect, my feet have not felt this good in years.

Reviewer ChuckyB18

These were a lot nicer than I thought they would be, at a fantastic price too. I bought them as a gift, so I will have to reserve final judgement when the recipient sees/wears them. Not an easy size to find in stores, so this is a great opportunity to get the shoe I wanted at the right price. Arrived fast, and in great condition

Reviewer JoeP

These shoes are amazingly light and comfy. I do buy a size up and put a Crocs brand insole in them for more comfort. Totally spoiled by these now, better than crocs.

Reviewer David Wickre

Never had vans before, thought I would give them a try. They are very well made and sturdy. The only reason I gave them 4 stars was the first day I wore them I got a blister on the back of my heel from them. Hopefully I can break them in with no more blisters! I really like the shoes so I hope they work out!

Reviewer AlexaJohara

Honestly. . . These shoes are super ugly. Having said that. . . . I quite like them. Hahahaha

They are very lightweight. I have the size 8 and they weigh 6oz. There is really nice padding inside. There’s also arch support. They easily slip-on, as there is so much stretch to the fabric. I like the tag on the back to help pull then on. Very breathable.

The sold is anti-skid. It’s plastic. I have some other shoes with what I believe to be a similar sole. I thought that they would wear-down quickly. . . but. . . that’s not been the case.

These shoes are Made in India. They look and feel cheap. . . but. . . I can’t get past the comfort part. Ever if they don’t last all that long. . . I’ll enjoy them while I can.

Reviewer Karen McVicker

Feel good. Look good. Great price!

Show1- 10(Results: 950)