Nike Womens Air Jordan 5 Retro Blue Bird DD9336-400

Reviewer trevstonlongworth

I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.

I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.

I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.

Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.

Reviewer Allison B Williams

I returned them and ordered next size and wider

Reviewer Janet Cochrane

some canvas and a big slab of rubber for the sole. Mostly comfortable, but nothing great. No arch support. It's a lot like walking barefoot, which is why I like them. Be sure to order a size smaller; I wear 12's in most all shoes but had to go with 11's here.

Reviewer J Wolfsberger

These shows are great to add a titch more style to an outfit than more typical sneakers, but they're still super comfortable. My feet don't typically require tons of cushion or arch support, so i caution those with bad feet or those who run a lot to maybe avoid these. I used to be a 50-60miles per week runner, and personally, i had to avoid these type of flattish-arched shoes or my feet would get sore / injured quickly. However, for the couple miles per day I walk in the city these days (in these shoes) and the 10 miles i run per week (not in these shoes), they work perfectly. Highly recommend

Reviewer bibsy

My daughter loves them. Vans are her favorite school shoes. I love that they last all year long.

Reviewer Loreen R Srockdale

Purchased a pair of these back in 2019(?) and they were very "squeaky" on linoleum, so much that they were difficult to wear at work. These are just as comfortable, but silent (maybe new sole compound? I have no idea). Will certainly buy again if these continue to be as stealthy as they have been so far.

Reviewer Dennis R Andrews

Shoes are somewhat bulky and heavy...but not bad.Feel almost like a desert boot.It's hard to find wide shoes and these were comfy from the first wearing. I like 'em!

Reviewer Steven W Metz

Love them, will buy again.

Reviewer bea Lanzetti

Love these. they look great.

Reviewer lezlie darling

Good quality for a great price . My husband speaks well about his new work shoes .