Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG "Fragment"

Reviewer trevstonlongworth

I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.

I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.

I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.

Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.

Reviewer Lduke32

Not the most stylish of shoes, but they worked great for what we needed them for the Rose Bowl Parade and everything else they did out there, he didn't have them broke in either, because there was no time, we got them 2 days before he left for his trip and he didn't have any issues at all with his feet hurting them and he actually stated he likes them and would buy another pair. He is hard on shoes and they've held up for a few months now so yes these are good walking shoes.

Reviewer J Eagleton

Lots of GI Joes for the price. Bought as a gift. Have not given it yet, but sure he will love it.

Reviewer penny petrie

Decided to go out on a limb and buy shoes with out going to a store. What a great experience. These shoes were a perfect fit, super comfortable, and great quality. I would suggest to anyone looking for a pair of walking around shoes.

Reviewer WE Welechowski

These are hands down the best shoes I have ever owned! My bad back is making walking far less fun. But these shoes real help ALLOT!

Reviewer U

These are great shoes. Only reason I gave 4 stars is durability. I do wear them everyday. I'd say they last about 9 months.

Reviewer Tuty

These Vans are just what I wanted them to be. Perfect and comfortable fit with nice color. Good price and fast shipping.

Reviewer Marcie K Wynn

one reason was that it was darker than expected (I ordered the natural white), it was closer to a very light tree bark than to the color white (would look great with jeans, though), the other was that there was a $10 price drop ($47 to $37) after I recieved the shoes.
If you like the color and the price is right then I recommend them

Reviewer Juancho1

These are very light shoes - they are fairly comfortable, I wish the arch support was better though. They look OK, not nearly as good as the picture, but are stylish enough to wear to work for business casual.

Reviewer Susan Flippin

Exactly what I was looking for in a sneaker. I bought different laces for them though. They are breathable and light. I love the color.