Reviewer juanita morris
Just a great walking shoe for this old man. Easy on and off, a cushioned sole, and plenty wide. As reviewers stated, they tend to pick up rocks off our driveway.
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer T Otis
ok shoe, very drafty. runs about a half size larger than asics
Reviewer Stefan Giroux
Super comfort.Nice cushion.Very breathable and quick dry.Also very grippy on wet surfaces
Reviewer Sara Post Lee
This is a nice pair of low ankle cut camo shoes for someone that does not want a pair of distracting bright colored shoes. The sole has medium flexibility and is good for all day regular play, but probably not the best for playing sports all day with friends. The sole has several layers and the rubber exterior of the sole extends high around all sides of the shoes, especially over the toes, less chance of getting your shoes wet from wet pavements, very nice! Also, it has a good medium arch support.
Made in China.
Reviewer Jonathan Hastie
Good shoe at a fair price.
Reviewer Dave Raphael
An extremely light-weight shoe. These are a good knock-around and quite stylish. Fit was a tad small, but they will stretch. Not something I would recommend for a 10-mile hike, but fine for around town. The weight surprised me, but I would expect this comes at some detriment to durability.
Reviewer bjena
Runs really wide but comfortable
Reviewer Karen Loch
Great product, good quality, I would definitely recommend this product. Size fit perfect and my daughter loves them. On time delivery and had no problem whatsoever.
Reviewer daisy mae
I couldn't find these in Academy Sports any longer. I found them on Amazon. I love these for Casual use. Goes great with Jeans or Slacks...I hate dress shoes.
Show12-
120(Results:
1691)